4.7 Article

A study to discover novel pharmaceutical cocrystals of pelubiprofen with a machine learning approach compared

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 24, 期 21, 页码 3938-3952

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ce00153e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) - Korea government (MSIT) [2020-0-01108]
  2. Soonchunhyang University Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using artificial neural network and pK(a) rule, potential coformers of PF to form cocrystals were predicted and experimentally verified. The resulting PF-INA and PF-NCA cocrystals exhibited improved solubility and dissolution behaviors compared to pure PF in acidic and neutral solutions. Combination of machine learning-based and knowledge-based coformer screening with subsequent synthetic experiments could be a potential approach for discovering novel pharmaceutical cocrystals in the future.
Pelubiprofen (PF), a biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) class II non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been on the market only in its crystalline form. To discover the first cocrystal form(s) of the drug, artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and the pK(a) rule were adopted to predict the most probable coformers that could form cocrystals with PF. Among candidate molecules examined theoretically and experimentally, isonicotinamide (INA) and nicotinamide (NCA) formed PF-based cocrystals through evaporative crystallization. The structures of the PF-INA and PF-NCA cocrystals were verified through multiple characterization techniques, including single-crystal X-ray diffraction. These two cocrystals demonstrated remarkably better water solubility and dissolution behaviors than did pure PF in both acidic and neutral solutions. Even with deficiency in the prediction capability, the combination of machine learning-based and knowledge-based coformer screening and the subsequent synthetic experiments would be a potential approach for discovering novel pharmaceutical cocrystals in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据