4.6 Article

Mortality Burden due to Exposure to Outdoor Fine Particulate Matter in Hanoi, Vietnam: Health Impact Assessment

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604331

关键词

Vietnam; mortality burden; PM2; 5; HIA; GEMM

资金

  1. Sydney's Sydney South East Asia Centre
  2. Sydney Vietnam Initiative
  3. Centre for Air Pollution, energy and health Research (CAR)
  4. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [105.08-2019.331]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the mortality burden due to PM2.5 exposure among adults living in Hanoi in 2017. The results showed that the PM2.5 concentrations in all districts of Hanoi exceeded the Vietnam Ambient National Standard, and a significant number of deaths could be avoided by reducing air pollution concentrations.
Objective: This study reports the mortality burden due to PM2.5 exposure among adults (age >25) living in Hanoi in 2017.Methods: We applied a health impact assessment methodology with the global exposure mortality model and a PM2.5 map with 3 x 3 km resolution derived from multiple data sources.Results: The annual average PM2.5 concentration for each grid ranged from 22.1 to 37.2 mu g/m(3). The district average concentration values ranged from 26.9 to 37.2 mu g/m(3), which means that none of the 30 districts had annual average values below the Vietnam Ambient National Standard of 25 mu g/m(3). Using the Vietnam Ambient National Standard as the reference standard, we estimated that 2,696 deaths (95% CI: 2,225 to 3,158) per year were attributable to exposure to elevated PM2.5 concentrations in Hanoi. Using the Interim Target 4 value of 10 mu g/m(3) as the reference standard, the number of excess deaths attributable to elevated PM2.5 exposure was 4,760 (95% CI: 3,958-5,534).Conclusion: A significant proportion of deaths in Hanoi could be avoided by reducing air pollution concentrations to a level consistent with the Vietnam Ambient National Standard.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据