4.4 Article

Spatiotemporal evolution of melt ponds on Arctic sea ice: MOSAiC observations and model results

期刊

出版社

UNIV CALIFORNIA PRESS
DOI: 10.1525/elementa.2021.000072

关键词

Sea ice; Arctic; Melt ponds; Snow

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration's New Investigator Program in Earth Science [80NSSC20K0658]
  2. National Science Foundation [1724540]
  3. NASA Cryosphere Program [NNX17AD27G, 80NSSC20K1253]
  4. NSF Office of Polar Programs [PLR-1603259]
  5. NSF [OPP-1724748, OPP-1724467]
  6. BMWi project ArcticSense [50EE1917A]
  7. AWI
  8. BMBF IceSense [03F0866A]
  9. Prof. Dr. Werner Petersen-Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the seasonal behavior and variability of melt ponds in the Arctic using in situ surveys, auxiliary observations, satellite retrievals, and two models. The results show that both models overestimate melt pond coverage in summer and have slight differences in simulating the freeze-up date. Accurate representation of sea-ice processes and properties is crucial for simulations of albedo feedbacks in a warming climate.
Melt ponds on sea ice play an important role in the Arctic climate system. Their presence alters the partitioning of solar radiation: decreasing reflection, increasing absorption and transmission to the ice and ocean, and enhancing melt. The spatiotemporal properties of melt ponds thus modify ice albedo feedbacks and the mass balance of Arctic sea ice. The Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition presented a valuable opportunity to investigate the seasonal evolution of melt ponds through a rich array of atmosphere-ice-ocean measurements across spatial and temporal scales. In this study, we characterize the seasonal behavior and variability in the snow, surface scattering layer, and melt ponds from spring melt to autumn freeze-up using in situ surveys and auxiliary observations. We compare the results to satellite retrievals and output from two models: the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) and the Marginal Ice Zone Modeling and Assimilation System (MIZMAS). During the melt season, the maximum pond coverage and depth were 21% and 22 +/- 13 cm, respectively, with distribution and depth corresponding to surface roughness and ice thickness. Compared to observations, both models overestimate melt pond coverage in summer, with maximum values of approximately 41% (MIZMAS) and 51% (CESM2). This overestimation has important implications for accurately simulating albedo feedbacks. During the observed freeze-up, weather events, including rain on snow, caused high-frequency variability in snow depth, while pond coverage and depth remained relatively constant until continuous freezing ensued. Both models accurately simulate the abrupt cessation of melt ponds during freeze-up, but the dates of freeze-up differ. MIZMAS accurately simulates the observed date of freeze-up, while CESM2 simulates freeze-up oneto-two weeks earlier. This work demonstrates areas that warrant future observation-model synthesis for improving the representation of sea-ice processes and properties, which can aid accurate simulations of albedo feedbacks in a warming climate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据