4.2 Article

Direct and Inverse Magnetocaloric Effect in a Ni50Mn35Al2Sn13 Heusler-Alloy Ribbon Sample

期刊

PHYSICS OF METALS AND METALLOGRAPHY
卷 123, 期 4, 页码 392-396

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S0031918X22040056

关键词

magnetocaloric effect; Heusler alloys; magnetostructural phase transition

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-38-90230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The magnetization and magnetocaloric effect (MCE) of a fast-hardened ribbon Ni50Mn35Al2Sn13 sample have been studied. The inverse effect value was found to depend on the temperature scanning rate, with higher scanning rates resulting in larger MCE values due to the relaxation effect and irreversibility of the phase transition. The inverse effect value was -0.39 K in an 18 kOe magnetic field, while the direct effect value was 0.2 K. The observed magnetization increase in a weak magnetic field was attributed to the Hopkinson effect and the coexistence of two crystalline phases.
The magnetization of a fast-hardened ribbon Ni50Mn35Al2Sn13 sample has been studied and its magnetocaloric effect (MCE) has been directly measured in the temperature range 100-350 K. The MCE has been investigated in a cyclic magnetic field of 1.8 T strength at a frequency of 0.2 Hz. The value of the inverse effect near the temperature of the magnetostructural phase transition (MSPT) has been shown to depend on the rate of temperature scanning. The higher the scanning rate, the greater the MCE value due to the kinetic relaxation effect in the martensitic phase and the irreversibility of the phase transition in the magnetic fields used. The value of the inverse effect when the magnetic field is turned on once is -0.39 K in the field of 18 kOe, and the value of the direct effect is 0.2 K. The significant magnetization increase observed near the T-C in a weak magnetic field (100 Oe) has been attributed to both the Hopkinson effect and the coexistence of two crystalline phases (austenite-martensite).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据