4.7 Article

Biobased polymer blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and high density polyethylene

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 984-990

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.066

关键词

Poly(trimethylene terephthalate); Polyethylene; Polymer blends; Biobased polymers

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Canada, Network for Innovative Plastic Materials and Manufacturing Processes (NIPMMP) program [400489]
  2. NSERC, Canada [400322]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two biobased polymers, poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and high density polyethylene with varying concentrations were injectionmolded for their performance evaluation. Differential scanning calorimetry determined that the majority of the blends exhibited a cold crystallization peak in the first heating cycle. Dynamic mechanical analysis revealed an increase in the storage modulus after the material has passed its T-g which can be related to the material's ability to cold crystallization. Blending demonstrated intermediate values for the tensile and flexural properties in comparison to each neat polymer. However, the notched Izod impact strength was higher for blends containing less than 50 wt.% biobased polyethylene (BioPE) compared to the virgin materials. The best performance in comparison to the other blends was observed for the PTT/BioPE (80/20) wt.% formulation, which had balanced tensile and flexural properties and an increase of 64% in the impact strength. This was explained through the impact fracture morphology via scanning electron microscopy. Variations in PTT and BioPE loading resulted in different surface structures, phase distributions and particle sizes. PTT as the minor phase resulted in randomly distributed large spheres. Whereas, when BioPE was the minor phase, it formed small uniform spherical/rod-like structures. Smaller particle size provided a toughening effect on the impact strength. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据