期刊
JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 90-105出版社
WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/jci-2021-0025
关键词
causality; covariate adjustment; structure learning; Bayesian networks; probability theory
Adjusting for covariates is a method to estimate causal effects, but different adjustment sets may lead to different precisions. The selection of adjustment set needs to consider the relationships between variables and sample size.
Adjusting for covariates is a well-established method to estimate the total causal effect of an exposure variable on an outcome of interest. Depending on the causal structure of the mechanism under study, there may be different adjustment sets, equally valid from a theoretical perspective, leading to identical causal effects. However, in practice, with finite data, estimators built on different sets may display different precisions. To investigate the extent of this variability, we consider the simplest non-trivial non-linear model of a v-structure on three nodes for binary data. We explicitly compute and compare the variance of the two possible different causal estimators. Further, by going beyond leading-order asymptotics, we show that there are parameter regimes where the set with the asymptotically optimal variance does depend on the edge coefficients, a result that is not captured by the recent leading-order developments for general causal models. As a practical consequence, the adjustment set selection needs to account for the relative magnitude of the relationships between variables with respect to the sample size and cannot rely on purely graphical criteria.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据