4.1 Article

Exploring Calbindin-IMPase fusion proteins structure and activity

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101266

关键词

Inositol monophosphatase; Calbindin-D28K; Inositol; Fusion protein; Bipolar disorder; Autophagy; SAXS

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1646620]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the interaction between Calbindin-D28k and IMPase, and reveals that the fusion proteins have higher activity and a different shape compared to the previous model. These findings provide important insights into this protein-protein interaction.
Calbindin-D28k is a calcium binding protein that is highly expressed in the mammalian central nervous system. It has been reported that calbindin-D28k binds to and increases the activity of inositol Monophosphatase (IMPase). This is an enzyme that is involved in the homeostasis of the Inositol trisphosphate signalling cascade by catalysing the final dephosphorylation of inositol and has been implicated in the therapeutic mechanism of lithium treatment of bipolar disorder. Previously studies have shown that calbindin-D28k can increase IMPase activity by up to 250 hundred-fold. A preliminary in silico model was proposed for the interaction. Here, we aimed at exploring the shape and properties of the calbindin-IMPase complex to gain new insights on this biologically important interaction. We created several fusion constructs of calbindin-D28k and IMPase, connected by flexible amino acid linkers of different lengths and orientations to fuse the termini of the two proteins together. The resulting fusion proteins have activities 200%-400% higher the isolated wild-type IMPase. The constructs were characterized by small angle X-ray scattering to gain information on the overall shape of the complexes and validate the previous model. The fusion proteins form a V-shaped, elongated and less compact complex as compared to the model. Our results shed new light into this protein-protein interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据