4.5 Article

Persistent Changes of Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subsets in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10020342

关键词

flow cytometry; head and neck cancer; lymphocyte subpopulations; peripheral circulation; squamous cell carcinoma

资金

  1. NASR [PN 19.29.01.01, 31PFE/31.12.2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the proportions of different lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients and found immune changes associated with the development of OSCC, providing new insights into the complex connections between immuno-inflammatory processes and carcinogenesis.
Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common cancer with high morbidity and mortality. Alterations of antitumor immune responses are involved in the development of this malignancy, and investigation of immune changes in the peripheral blood of OSCC patients has aroused the interest of researchers. Methods: In our study, we assessed the proportions of CD3+ total T lymphocytes, CD3+CD4+ helper T lymphocytes, CD3+CD8+ suppressor/cytotoxic T lymphocytes, CD3-CD19+ total B lymphocytes, and CD3-CD16+CD56+ NK cells in the peripheral blood of OSCC patients. Results: The data obtained both pre- and post-therapy showed a similar level of total CD3+ T lymphocytes in OSCC patients and control subjects, pinpointing the stability of this immune parameter. On the other hand, pre-therapeutic data showed a lower proportion of helper T lymphocytes (CD4+), a significantly higher level of cytotoxic/suppressive T lymphocytes (CD8+), and a much lower CD4+ T lymphocyte/CD8+ T lymphocyte ratio compared to control subjects. Conversely, evaluation of circulating NK (CD16+) cells showed a markedly higher pre-therapeutic level compared to the control group. Conclusions: Our results related to immune changes in the peripheral blood add new information to this complex universe of connections between immuno-inflammatory processes and carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据