期刊
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -出版社
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9050160
关键词
epicardial; thoracoscopy; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure
This study compared the outcomes of patients with epicardial LV leads and endocardial LV leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy. It found that both approaches achieved comparable acute and post-discharge outcomes.
(1) Background: Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of epicardial left ventricular (LV) lead placement using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). (2) Methods: Acute and post-discharge outcomes of CRT were compared between patients with epicardial LV leads (Epicardial-LV group, n = 13) and those with endocardial LV leads (Endocardial-LV group, n = 243). (3) Results: Epicardial LV leads were implanted via VATS alone (n = 8) or along with mini-thoracotomy (n = 5), for failed endocardial implantation (n = 11) or recurrent lead dislodgement (n = 2). All epicardial procedures under general anesthesia with one-lung ventilation were successfully completed in 1.0 +/- 0.4 h without phrenic nerve stimulation. LV pacing thresholds in the epicardial-LV (1.5 +/- 1.0 V) and endocardial-LV (1.3 +/- 0.8 V) were comparable (p = 0.651). All patients were discharged alive post-VATS 8.8 +/- 3.9 days. During the follow-up (34.3 +/- 28.6 months), all patients with epicardial LV leads stayed alive except for one cardiac death post-CRT 14 months and one heart transplantation post-CRT 30 months. All epicardial LV leads maintained stable performance without dislodgement/significant changes in pacing threshold/impedance. LV lead dislodgement occurred only in endocardial-LV (7/243, 2.9%). Efficacy in both groups was comparable in terms of QRS narrowing, increase in LV ejection fraction, and survival free of cardiac death, or heart-failure-related hospitalization. (4) Conclusions: Epicardial LV lead placement using VATS can be a safe and effective alternative to endocardial implantation, with comparable acute and post-discharge outcomes achieved by both approaches.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据