4.1 Article

Numerical Simulation of High-Density Ratio Bubble Motion with interIsoFoam

期刊

FLUIDS
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fluids7050152

关键词

bubble flow; high-density ratio; OpenFOAM; two-phase flow; volume of fluid method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The breeding blanket is a crucial component in a nuclear fusion reactor, responsible for fuel production and tritium generation. This study simulated bubble motion in a helium-lead-lithium system using the interIsoFoam solver of OpenFOAM v2012, aiming to explore its potential for fusion applications.
The breeding blanket is one of the fundamental components of a nuclear fusion reactor and is responsible for the fuel production, generating tritium through neutronic capture reaction between lithium and neutrons. Lithium is a liquid PbLi alloy and the helium formed as reaction by-product can coalesce into bubbles, generating a two-phase mixture with a high-density ratio (eta(rho) similar to O-5). These bubbles can accumulate and stagnate within the blanket channels with potentially harmful consequences. In this work, the interIsoFoam solver of OpenFOAM v2012 is used to simulate bubble motion for a two-phase mixture representative of the He-PbLi system to test its potential for future developments in the field of fusion. In a first phase, several traditional benchmarks were carried out, both 2D and 3D, and considering the two variants of the VOF method implemented in the solver, isoAdvector and plicRDF. Subsequently, He bubbles of different diameters rising in liquid PbLi (eta(rho )= 1.2 x 10(5)) were analysed to investigate different regimes. For a Eotvos number (Eo) greater than 10, it was possible to recreate the axisymmetric, skirted, oscillatory regimes and the peripheral and central breakup regimes. For Eo < 10, non-physical deformations of the interface are observed, probably generated by spurious velocities that have a greater impact on the solution for very small bubbles and rising velocities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据