4.7 Article Data Paper

Spatial and temporal dynamics of multidimensional well-being, livelihoods and ecosystem services in coastal Bangladesh

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.94

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department for International Development
  2. Economic and Social Research Council
  3. Natural Environment Research Council
  4. Assessing Health, Livelihoods, Ecosystem Services And Poverty Alleviation In Populous Deltas (Espa Deltas), part of the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme [NE/J000892/1]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J000892/1, NE/J002755/1, NE/L008726/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NERC [NE/J002755/1, NE/L008726/1, NE/J000892/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Populations in resource dependent economies gain well-being from the natural environment, in highly spatially and temporally variable patterns. To collect information on this, we designed and implemented a 1586-household quantitative survey in the southwest coastal zone of Bangladesh. Data were collected on material, subjective and health dimensions of well-being in the context of natural resource use, particularly agriculture, aquaculture, mangroves and fisheries. The questionnaire included questions on factors that mediate poverty outcomes: mobility and remittances; loans and micro-credit; environmental perceptions; shocks; and women's empowerment. The data are stratified by social-ecological system to take into account spatial dynamics and the survey was repeated with the same respondents three times within a year to incorporate seasonal dynamics. The dataset includes blood pressure measurements and height and weight of men, women and children. In addition, the household listing includes basic data on livelihoods and income for approximately 10,000 households. The dataset facilitates interdisciplinary research on spatial and temporal dynamics of well-being in the context of natural resource dependence in low income countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据