4.8 Article

Sustainable synthesis of bio-based PTMEG and methane beyond the Reppe method

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 15, 页码 5770-5778

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2gc01092e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0701100]
  2. Recruitment Program of Global Young Experts in China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A green and economically feasible route for synthesizing PTMEG and methane using the furfural method was developed, which showed economic and environmental advantages over the traditional Reppe technique.
To resolve the issues of a highly polluting and energy-intensive industry based on the Reppe method, herein we developed an economically feasible green route for the synthesis of poly(tetramethylene ether glycol) (PTMEG) and methane from furfural (FA). The synthesis route consisted of the base metal Ni and/or Cu catalyzed full hydrogenation of FA, followed by the subsequent selective hydrodeoxygenation of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) to tetrahydrofuran (THF) and methane. The latter was the key step for the process, where tetrahydrofurfural acted as an important intermediate in the alcohol-aldehyde equilibrium of THFA conversion on the Ni surface in a fix-bed reactor. This was followed by its decarbonylation to 2,3-dihydrofuran and CO, and subsequent hydrogenation to THF and methane. THF polymerization was catalyzed by phosphotungstic acid (PWA) with epichlorohydrin (ECH) as the initiator to produce PTMEG with a controllable molecular weight and distribution (M-w = 1889, D = 1.483). The comparative techno-economic analysis also demonstrated that the furfural method was more responsive to economic and green concerns than the traditional Reppe technique. Therefore, as the highly polluting and energy-intensive Reppe industry will most likely be restricted in a low carbon society, the green and economical furfural method is poised to establish sustained competitiveness for producing bio-PTMEG and bio-methane in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据