4.7 Article

Higgs boson production at the LHC: fast and precise predictions in QCD at higher orders

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 82, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10436-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union [740006]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) through the plan GenT program [CIDEGENT/2020/011]
  3. Spanish Government (Agencia Estatal de Investigacion)
  4. ERDF funds from European Commission - MCIN/AEI [PID2020-114473GB-I00]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [740006] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a new numerical program, HTurbo, which accurately predicts the production cross sections of Higgs bosons in a fast and precise manner. The program implements the perturbative QCD expansion and resummation of large logarithmic corrections, and includes the production and decay of Higgs bosons through gluon fusion and two-photon processes with complete dependence on the final-state kinematics. We benchmark our predictions against other numerical programs, HRes and HNNLO, and show that HTurbo is an improved reimplementation.
We present a new numerical program, HTurbo, which provides fast and numerically precise predictions for Higgs boson production cross sections. The present version of the code implements the perturbative QCD expansion up to the next-to-next-to-leading order also combined with the resummation of the large logarithmic corrections at small transverse momenta up to next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy and it includes the Higgs boson production through gluon fusion and decay in two photons with the full dependence on the final-state kinematics. Arbitrary kinematical cuts can be applied to the final states in order to obtain fiducial cross sections and associated kinematical distributions. We present a benchmark comparison with the predictions obtained with the numerical programs HRes and HNNLO programs for which HTurbo represents an improved reimplementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据