4.6 Article

A mixed solvent strategy enabling efficient all-solution-processed perovskite light-emitting diodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 8964-8971

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tc01201d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62174104, 51675322, 62105195]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [19010500600, 22YF1413500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The utilization of a mixture of chlorobenzene and dichloromethane as an orthogonal solvent to deposit upper layers on perovskite films resulted in smooth and dense films, leading to high-performance all-solution-processed PeLEDs.
Due to the ionic feature of perovskites, the fabrication of perovskite light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs) is highly dependent on vacuum deposition technology to construct solid perovskite/charge transport layer (CTL) heterojunctions and avoid the destruction of the perovskite layer by solvents of the upper solution-processed CTLs. Herein, we employ a mixture of chlorobenzene (CB) and dichloromethane (DCM) with distinctive boiling points as an orthogonal solvent for the polyfluorene poly[(9,9-bis(3 '-(N,N-dimethylamino)propyl)-2,7-fluorene)-alt-2,7-(9,9-dioctylfluorene)] (PFN) when depositing the upper electron transport layer (ETL) on the perovskite layer. By adjusting the ratios of CB and DCM, smooth and dense PFN films are obtained due to the effective control over the solvent evaporation rates. Moreover, the work function of PFN dissolved in the orthogonal solvent with an optimal volume ratio of CB and DCM is downshifted on account of the large dielectric constant of DCM, which results in a high dipole moment at the PFN/perovskite interface, thus reducing the charge transfer between the perovskite and PFN films. As a result, we achieve an efficient all-solution-processed PeLED with a champion EQE of 4.76% and a maximum luminance of 19 750 cd m(-2) at 513 nm. Our work provides a facile strategy to realize high-performance all-solution-processed PeLEDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据