4.5 Review

Analysis of Research Directions on the Rehabilitation of Patients with Stroke and Diabetes Using Scientometric Methods

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10050773

关键词

diabetes; stroke; scientometrics; Web of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article adopts a multidisciplinary approach to investigate the rehabilitation of patients with stroke and diabetes by reviewing literature published in the Web of Science over the past decade. Scientometric methods were used to extract relevant scientific output and identify research directions in this field. The findings of this study are important for the proper care of patients with diabetes and stroke.
The multidisciplinary approach to the rehabilitation of patients with stroke and diabetes has been followed in this article by a review of the literature published in the Web of Science in the last ten years. A review of the literature was performed using scientometric methods. VOS Viewer software was used to determine the research directions in this area. Scientometric analysis has extracted relevant published scientific output that treats diabetes and stroke. Studies based on qualitative research and the conclusions of these studies were analyzed. The clusters with the keywords used in the title and abstract by the authors who published in the Web of Science were reviewed and research directions in the field were formulated. The proper care of diabetes and its numerous consequences, including stroke and its neurologic complications, necessitates the fast identification of research findings in various types of medicines and their efficacy when applied to various patient groups, such as diabetic patients, whose recovery after a stroke is similar to that of a nondiabetic patient following hemodynamic stabilization, although it takes longer and has poorer outcomes. The limitations of the study refer to the fact that the data reviewed are from the Web of Science only.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据