4.8 Article

Influence of Microstructure on the Elution Behavior of Gradient Copolymers in Different Modes of Liquid Interaction Chromatography

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 94, 期 22, 页码 7844-7852

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00193

关键词

-

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P20145, BiCN/18-20-004, Bi-CN/20-22-073]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52022031, 21734004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of microstructure on the chromatographic behavior of copolymers. The results show that the elution volume of copolymers increases with the increasing strength of the gradient. This study highlights the importance of considering the effect of microstructure in addition to the chemical composition and molar mass when analyzing copolymers using liquid interaction chromatography methods.
We studied the influence of microstructure on the chromatographic behavior of gradient copolymers with different gradient strengths and block copolymer with completely segregated blocks by using gradient liquid adsorption chromatography (gLAC) and liquid chromatography at critical conditions (LCCC) for one of the copolymer constituents. The copolymers consist of repeating units of poly(propylene oxide) and poly(propylene phthalate) and have comparable average chemical composition and molar mass, and a narrow molar mass distribution to avoid as much as possible the influence of these parameters on the elution behavior of the copolymers. On both reversed stationary phases, the elution volume of gradient copolymers increases with the increasing strength of the gradient. The results indicate that for both modes of liquid interaction chromatography, it is important to consider the effect of microstructure on the elution behavior of the gradient copolymers in addition to the copolymer chemical composition and molar mass in the case of gLAC and the length of the chromatographically visible copolymer constituent in the case of LCCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据