4.7 Article

Cross-Tissue Regulatory Gene Networks in Coronary Artery Disease

期刊

CELL SYSTEMS
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 196-208

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria's Foundation of Freemasons
  4. Astra-Zeneca Translational Science Centre-Karolinska Institutet
  5. University of Tartu
  6. Estonian Research Council [8853]
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J004235/1, BB/M020053/1]
  8. American Heart Association [14SFRN20490315, 14SFRN20840000]
  9. NIH (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NHLBI] [R01HL71207, K23HL111339, K99HL121172]
  10. EU [HEALTH-F2-2013-601456]
  11. BBSRC [BB/M020053/1, BBS/E/D/20211552] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/20211552, BB/M020053/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inferring molecular networks can reveal how genetic perturbations interact with environmental factors to cause common complex diseases. We analyzed genetic and gene expression data from seven tissues relevant to coronary artery disease (CAD) and identified regulatory gene networks (RGNs) and their key drivers. By integrating data from genome-wide association studies, we identified 30 CAD-causal RGNs interconnected in vascular and metabolic tissues, and we validated them with corresponding data from the Hybrid Mouse Diversity Panel. As proof of concept, by targeting the key drivers AIP, DRAP1, POLR2I, and PQBP1 in a cross-species-validated, arterial-wall RGN involving RNA-processing genes, we re-identified this RGN in THP-1 foam cells and independent data from CAD macrophages and carotid lesions. This characterization of the molecular landscape in CAD will help better define the regulation of CAD candidate genes identified by genomewide association studies and is a first step toward achieving the goals of precision medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据