4.7 Article

Defective Signaling in the JAK-STAT Pathway Tracks with Chronic Inflammation and Cardiovascular Risk in Aging Humans

期刊

CELL SYSTEMS
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 374-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.09.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ellison Medical Foundation
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U19 AI057229, U19 AI090019, HHSN272201200028C, BWF IRSA 1015009, AHA 13EIA14420025]
  4. Clinical and Translational Science Award for the Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (Spectrum) from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [5UL1 RR025744]
  5. Israeli Science Foundation [1365/12]
  6. Stanford Cardiovascular Institute
  7. Stanford Center on Longevity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic inflammation, a decline in immune responsiveness, and reduced cardiovascular function are all associated with aging, but the relationships among these phenomena remain unclear. Here, we longitudinally profiled a total of 84 signaling conditions in 91 young and older adults and observed an age-related reduction in cytokine responsiveness within four immune cell lineages, most prominently T cells. The phenotype can be partially explained by elevated baseline levels of phosphorylated STAT (pSTAT) proteins and a different response capacity of naive versus memory T cell subsets to interleukin 6 (IL-6), interferon alpha (IFN-alpha), and, to a lesser extent, IL-21 and IFN-gamma. Baseline pSTAT levels tracked with circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), and we derived a cytokine response score that negatively correlates with measures of cardiovascular disease, specifically diastolic dysfunction and atherosclerotic burden, outperforming CRP. Thus, we identified an immunological link between inflammation, decreased cell responsiveness in the JAK-STAT pathway, and cardiovascular aging. Targeting chronic inflammation may ameliorate this deficiency in cellular responsiveness and improve cardiovascular function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据