4.7 Article

A silicon-based surface code quantum computer

期刊

NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npjqi.2015.19

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/J015067/1]
  2. UNDEDD project [EP/K025945/1]
  3. European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC [279781]
  4. Royal Society
  5. EPSRC National Quantum Technology Hub in Networked Quantum Information Processing
  6. EPSRC [EP/H025952/1, EP/H025952/2, EP/I035536/2, EP/I035536/1, EP/K025945/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1379428, 1102904, EP/H025952/1, EP/K025945/1, EP/I035536/2, EP/H025952/2, EP/I035536/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individual impurity atoms in silicon can make superb individual qubits, but it remains an immense challenge to build a multi-qubit processor: there is a basic conflict between nanometre separation desired for qubit-qubit interactions and the much larger scales that would enable control and addressing in a manufacturable and fault-tolerant architecture. Here we resolve this conflict by establishing the feasibility of surface code quantum computing using solid-state spins, or `data qubits', that are widely separated from one another. We use a second set of `probe' spins that are mechanically separate from the data qubits and move in and out of their proximity. The spin dipole-dipole interactions give rise to phase shifts; measuring a probe's total phase reveals the collective parity of the data qubits along the probe's path. Using a protocol that balances the systematic errors due to imperfect device fabrication, our detailed simulations show that substantial misalignments can be handled within fault-tolerant operations. We conclude that this simple `orbital probe' architecture overcomes many of the difficulties facing solid-state quantum computing, while minimising the complexity and offering qubit densities that are several orders of magnitude greater than other systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据