4.6 Article

The strigolactone receptor D14 targets SMAX1 for degradation in response to GR24 treatment and osmotic stress

期刊

PLANT COMMUNICATIONS
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100303

关键词

phytohormone; signaling; proteolysis; crosstalk

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [IOS-1737153, IOS-1740560, IOS-1856741]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BIO2017-84363-R, PID2020-112779RB-I00]
  3. FESF Investing in Your Future

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of phytohormones SL and smoke-derived KARs on plants differ, despite their similar perception mechanisms. Recent research suggests that the phytohormone D14 can interact with SMAX1 and affect plant responses. Although the interaction between D14 and SMAX1 is weaker, it mediates the degradation of SMAX1 induced by GR24 and plays a protective role in plants.
The effects of the phytohormone strigolactone (SL) and smoke-derived karrikins (KARs) on plants are generally distinct, despite the fact that they are perceived through very similar mechanisms. The homologous receptors DWARF14 (D14) and KARRIKIN-INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2), together with the F-box protein MORE AXILLARY GROWTH2 (MAX2), mediate SL and KAR responses, respectively, by targeting different SMAX1-LIKE (SMXL) family proteins for degradation. These mechanisms are putatively well-insulated, with D14-MAX2 targeting SMXL6, SMXL7, and SMXL8 and KAI2-MAX2 targeting SMAX1 and SMXL2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Recent evidence challenges this model. We investigated whether D14 can target SMAX1 and whether this occurs naturally. Genetic analysis indicates that the SL analog GR24 promotes D14SMAX1 crosstalk. Although D14 shows weaker interactions with SMAX1 than with SMXL2 or SMXL7, D14 mediates GR24-induced degradation of SMAX1 in plants. Osmotic stress triggers SMAX1 degradation, which is protective, through SL biosynthesis and signaling genes. Thus, D14-SMAX1 crosstalk may be beneficial and not simply a vestige of the evolution of the SL pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据