4.7 Article

THF-enabled PtBr2-catalyzed desymmetric hydrogenative [3+2] cycloaddition of 2-alkynylbenzaldehyde-tethered cyclohexadienones

期刊

ORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 9, 期 13, 页码 3577-3584

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2qo00593j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21502093, DP210103425]
  2. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A THF-enabled PtBr2-catalyzed desymmetric hydrogenative [3 + 2] cycloaddition of 2-alkynylbenzaldehyde-tethered cyclohexadienones has been developed. The protocol provides a highly functionalized 6-7-6 polycyclic skeleton with four contiguous stereocenters in good to excellent yields. The involvement of an in situ formed Pt-bound benzopyrylium species in the cascade reaction pathway and the generation of a metallocarbene species that undergoes hydrogenation with THF as the hydride transfer source are novel findings. The catalytic method also demonstrates its synthetic utility in the late-stage stereoselective modification of steroids.
A THF-enabled PtBr2-catalyzed desymmetric hydrogenative [3 + 2] cycloaddition of 2-alkynylbenzaldehyde-tethered cyclohexadienones has been developed. The protocol provides a highly functionalized 6-7-6 polycyclic skeleton with four contiguous stereocenters in good to excellent yields of up to 97% yield and with exclusive exo-selectivity. The suggested cascade reaction pathway delineates a rare instance in platinum catalysis of the involvement of an in situ formed Pt-bound benzopyrylium species that participates in a Huisgen-type [3 + 2] cycloaddition with an electron-deficient alkene tether in the highly reactive organometallic intermediate. It also offers the first example of a metallocarbene species generated in this manner which undergoes hydrogenation with THF as the hydride transfer source. The synthetic utility of the catalytic method was exemplified by the late-stage stereoselective modification of the steroids estrone and estradiol under mild reaction conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据