4.6 Article

SANS characterization of time dependent, slow molecular exchange in an SDS micellar system

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 24, 期 28, 页码 16988-16996

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp00930g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular exchange of SDS micelles in aqueous solution was investigated using time-resolved small angle neutron scattering. The results showed that the randomization process of pure h-SDS and d-SDS micelles occurs in two steps, with the kinetics in the second step dominated by the formation of domains rich in specific components.
We have investigated the molecular exchange of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles in aqueous solution by time-resolved small angle neutron scattering (TR-SANS) measurements as a function of the surfactant and salt concentration. Starting with deuterated (d-SDS) and protonated (h-SDS) SDS micelles, surfactant exchange across the micelles leads to a randomized distribution of d-SDS and h-SDS within each micelle. By employing the contrast matching technique, we have studied this randomization process which is a direct measure of the molecular exchange of this system. Our results show that the randomization of the pure h-SDS and d-SDS micelles occurs in two steps: first, an almost instantaneous drop in the scattering intensity is observed where similar to 80% of the micelles are randomized (contrast matched). After this, micelle randomization progresses slowly spanning over similar to 100 hours. Importantly, we show that the kinetics in the second step are dominated by the formation of domains rich in either h-SDS, d-SDS and randomized (50 : 50 h-SDS : d-SDS). The slow exchange step is modeled via a phenomenological approach by drawing analogy to the Langmuir adsorption theory. Finally, the effects of the surfactant and salt concentrations on the instantaneous, and the time dependent randomization of SDS micelles are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据