4.7 Article

MicroRNA-124 modulates neuroinflammation in acute methanol poisoning rats via targeting Kruppel-like factor-6

期刊

BIOENGINEERED
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 13507-13519

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2078549

关键词

Neuroinflammation; MicroRNA-124; Kruppel-like factor-6; acute methanol poisoning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the role of miR-124 in AMP-stimulated neuroinflammation and its molecular mechanism. The findings showed that miR-124 can modulate microglia activation via targeting KLF6, accelerating M2 polarization and alleviating neurodegeneration induced by AMP.
Microglia activation-stimulated neuroinflammation exerts functionally in neurodegenerative diseases like brain injury. Acute methanol poisoning (AMP) is a crucial cause of death and morbidity that possibly leads to neuroinflammation. Studies have manifested that miRNAs can modulate microglia activation to mediate neuroinflammation. Nevertheless, the role of miR-124 in AMP-stimulated neuroinflammation is uncertain. This research was to explore the action of miR-124 in AMP-stimulated neuroinflammation and its molecular mechanism. The study findings indicated that AMP accelerated microglia activation and stimulated inflammation and oxidative stress in brain tissue of rats. MiR-124 expression was lowered in AMP rats, while KLF6 expression was elevated. Elevated miR-124 or repressed KLF6 increased the number of CD206(+) cells and decreased the number of CD68(+) cells, as well as restrained inflammation and NF-kappa B phosphorylation and induced superoxide dismutase, Nrf2/HO-1, and M2 polarization. MiR-124 modulated microglia activation via targeting KLF6. AMP repressed neuronal viability and enhanced neuronal apoptosis. Suppression of miR-124 further promoted AMP-induced damage to neurons, while inhibition of KLF6 turned around this phenomenon. Anyway, our study demonstrated that miR-124 accelerates M2 polarization via targeting KLF6 to ameliorate AMP-stimulated neuronal damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据