4.6 Article

Linking microscopic structural changes and macroscopic mechanical responses in a near-ideal bottlebrush elastomer under uniaxial deformation

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 18, 期 24, 页码 4527-4535

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2sm00492e

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19K15630]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K15630] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bottlebrush elastomers with dense side chain grafting on load-bearing network strands have unique mechanical properties. In this study, the microscopic structural changes of a model bottlebrush elastomer under uniaxial deformation were investigated using in situ small-angle X-ray scattering and tensile tests. The results showed significant strain stiffening and backbone chain alignment in the bottlebrush elastomer, which were not observed in similar side chain-free elastomers and gels.
Bottlebrush (BB) elastomers, in which load-bearing network strands are densely grafted with side chains, are gaining much attention due to their unique mechanical properties. Herein, we used in situ small-angle X-ray scattering coupled with tensile tests to investigate the microscopic structural changes induced in a model BB elastomer with a controlled network structure under uniaxial deformation. The model BB elastomer was synthesized by end-linking a monodisperse star-shaped BB polymer, which ensured a controlled network structure. The BB elastomer exhibited both significant strain stiffening and backbone chain alignment under uniaxial loading, and these properties were not observed in an analogous side chain-free elastomer and gel. It was also found that the side chains in the BB elastomer did not show any sign of chain orientation even when the attached backbone chain was aligned in the stretching direction. These observations highlighted the roles of side chains: they were structurally disordered at the segment level but their steric repulsion made the backbone chain aligned and overstretched.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据