4.3 Article

The STAMPEDE trial: paradigm-changing data through innovative trial design

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 S485-S490

出版社

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2016.09.08

关键词

Androgen deprivation; docetaxel; stampede; zoledronic acid

类别

资金

  1. Janssen
  2. Astellas
  3. Sanofi
  4. Dendreon
  5. ESSA
  6. Merck
  7. Medivation
  8. Johnson Johnson
  9. Exelixis
  10. Genentech
  11. Novartis
  12. Bristol Myers-Squibb
  13. Tokai
  14. Pfizer
  15. Blue Earth Diagnostics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the numerous regulatory approvals for prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer remains a huge burden for men worldwide. In an exciting development, James et al. recently published data from the Systemic Therapy in Advanced or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy: a multi-stage multi-arm randomised control trial (STAMPEDE). This is an innovative multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) trial that has utilized one control arm and several comparator arms in order to provide evidence for the inclusion of therapies beyond standard androgen deprivation alone. The patient population included: (I) men with high-risk, non-metastatic, node-negative disease; (II) men with distant-metastatic or node-positive disease; and (III) men with previously-treated prostate cancer by prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy presenting with relapse. Men were to continue androgen deprivation for at least 2 years. The current data published by this group supports earlier results and provides additional evidence that docetaxel utilized in an up-front fashion provides a survival benefit in men with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer. Moreover, the initial results from STAMPEDE show how therapies without a demonstrated survival benefit can be efficiently excluded from further study once the likelihood of a benefit is ruled out by a predetermined analysis. In this piece, we will review the STAMPEDE data, contrast it with existing results, and provide our perspectives on how this will affect future trial conduct in the field of prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据