4.0 Review

Perspectives on the systematic review for the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans for calcium

期刊

NUTRITION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 S89-S112

出版社

KOREAN NUTRITION SOC
DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2022.16.S1.S89

关键词

Calcium; Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans; bone; adolescents; review

资金

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare [20180415A13-00, 25193068200, 25203084501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to summarize research findings on calcium intake, evaluate its impact on health outcomes, and determine the adequacy of revising the 2020 KDRIs for calcium. While no new evidence was found for the general Korean adult population, there may be evidence to improve EAR criteria in children and adolescents.
An accurate assessment of the recommended calcium (Ca) intake may contribute to reducing the risk of fractures and chronic diseases, ultimately improving quality of life. This review was performed to summarize key findings of Ca studies, investigate the effect of Ca intake on health outcomes, and determine the adequacy of evidence to revise the 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs) for Ca in 2020. Databases were searched for intervention studies that assessed health outcomes by providing Ca in diets or as supplements. The framework of the systematic review comprised conducting literature searches, data extraction, quality assessment of the literature, and summarizing key findings relevant to set the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for Ca for the 2020 KDRI. The final search was performed in June 2019. A total of 13,309 studies were identified through databases and manual search. Sixtyfive studies were included in the final quality assessment and were summarized according to health indicators. As bone health was used as an indicator of the EAR for Ca, literature reports on bone health were further categorized by the life-cycle stage of the participants. This systematic review did not find new evidence that could be applied to the general Korean adult population, including postmenopausal women, for defining a new EAR for Ca in the 2020 KDRIs. Evidence in most of the reviewed literature was considered weak; however, some evidence was found that could improve the criteria on how the EAR for Ca was determined in children and adolescents. A review of the literature for the 2020 KDRIs for Ca did not find strong evidence in order to change the recommended values of the 2015 KDRIs. More clinical interventions are required among Koreans to strengthen the body of evidence to warrant the revision of the KDRIs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据