4.7 Article

In-situ growth of iron phosphide encapsulated by carbon nanotubes decorated with zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 for enhancing oxygen reduction reaction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 39, 页码 17367-17378

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.2280360-3199

关键词

Taiwan; Fuel cell; Oxygen reduction reaction; Carbon nanotube; Iron phosphide; Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 104-2628-E-011-003-MY3, MOST 108-3116-F-005-002]
  2. National Taiwan University of Science and Technology-Tokyo Institute of Technology Joint Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly efficient non-precious metal electrocatalyst was obtained through in-situ growth of iron phosphide encapsulated by carbon nanotubes decorated with zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. The catalyst exhibits close to ideal electron transfer and high oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity, along with long-term stability.
A non-precious metal electrocatalyst was obtained through the in-situ growth of iron phosphide (Fe2P) encapsulated by carbon nanotubes (CNTs) decorated with zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8). Upon pyrolysis at a specific temperature, the ZIF-8/Fe2P@CNT catalyst exhibits high oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) ability and is close to the ideal electron transfer, which number is 3.99. The structure, high number of nitrogencontaining functional groups, and suitable surface properties of ZIF-8/Fe2P@CNT are critical for enhancing the ORR activity. ZIF-8/Fe2P@CNT exhibits a decay in electrocatalytic activity of 26 mV in the half-wave potential after 30 000 cycles, which is considerably superior to the decay of 123 mV for Pt/C after the same number of cycles. Therefore, ZIF-8/ Fe2P@CNT exhibits excellent ORR activity and long-term stability and can be used as a fuel cell catalyst. (C) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据