4.3 Article

Manganese removal and product characteristics of a marine manganese-oxidizing bacterium Bacillus sp. FF-1

期刊

INTERNATIONAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 701-708

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10123-022-00254-9

关键词

Bacillus; Oxidation; Bioremediation; Identification; Environmental

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41977197]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT20JC49]
  3. Xingliao Talent Plan Projects in Liaoning province [XLYC1907109]
  4. Dalian Municipal Outstanding Youth Science And Technology Talent Project [2019RJ09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a Bacillus sp. strain FF-1, isolated from marine sediments in the Bohai Sea, China, was found to be capable of oxidizing Mn(II) and removing manganese ions, forming a mixture of MnOx and MnCO3.
Biogenic manganese oxides (BioMnO(x)) have been found all over the world, and most of them were formed by Mn(II)-oxidizing bacteria (MnOB). In this study, a MnOB designated as FF-1 was isolated from marine surface sediments in the Bohai Sea, China. This strain was identified as Bacillus sp. and can tolerate more than 5% salinity. It can grow in the presence of 0-7 mM Mn(II) and pH range from 5.0 to 7.0. When the initial Mn(II) was 5 mM, the percentage of Mn(II) oxidation reached the highest value of 16% after 10 days of incubation. The initial pH (5.0 to 7.0) affected the percentage of Mn(II) oxidation, but the ability of the strain FF-1 to self-regulate pH resulted in the final pH being almost 7.6. The removal of Mn(II) by the strain FF-1 involves extracellular and intracellular adsorption as well as Mn(II) oxidation. Intracellular Mn adsorption contributed a small part to the total Mn removal, and extracellular adsorption was dominant in the initial stage of Mn removal. The solid products after Mn removal were a mixture of MnOx and MnCO3. The layered MnOx formed in the extracellular space could be easily collected and used for adsorption and oxidation of pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据