4.7 Article

Tight Bound on Incnetive Ratio for Sybil Attack in Resource Sharing System

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CLOUD COMPUTING
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 913-924

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCC.2020.2984760

关键词

Game theory; resource sharing; market equilibrium mechanism; incentive ratio

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61761146005, 11871366, 61803279, 61632017]
  2. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (ECS Project) [26200314]
  3. USTS [XKZ2017003]
  4. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (GRF Project) [16213115, 16243516]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the Sybil attack in a sharing-based economic system and examines the robustness of the market equilibrium mechanism against such an attack. By measuring the incentive ratio, it is found that no participant can increase their share by more than root 2 times in the market equilibrium solution.
In this article, we discuss the Sybil attack on a sharing-based economic system where each participant contributes its own resource for all to share. Such an attack is possible especially in the cloud computing model where agents can exchange information with the cloud and obtain aggregated information from it. We are interested in the robustness of the market equilibrium mechanism against such an attack. We adopt the incentive ratio to measure the gain that a participant can make by splitting its identity and reconstructing communication connections with others. On one hand, we show that no player can increase more than root 2 times its original share in the market equilibrium solution by characterizing the worst case, in which a strategic agent can obtain the maximal gain in utility by playing the Sybil attack. On the other hand, the bound of root 2 is proved to be tight by constructing a proper instance. We also simulate on a series of random graphs and observe that the incentive ratio was no more than two in the general setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据