4.1 Article

Tuberculosis in infants: a retrospective study in China

期刊

SPRINGERPLUS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2184-7

关键词

Tuberculosis; Infant; China; Bacille Calmette-Guerin

资金

  1. Health Department of Shandong Province [2011HZ085]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Jinan [201303043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To describe the demographics, clinical characteristics and microbiologic findings of infant (<= 2 years old) tuberculosis (TB) in a high TB burden country. Between Feb, 2007 and Jun, 2015, 115 TB infants who admitted to our hospital were enrolled in the study. Their clinicopathological characteristics were reviewed and analyzed. The mean age was 10.1 +/- 7.4 (SD) months, and 84 of 115 infants (73.0 %) were males. 23 patients (20.0 %) had isolated pulmonary TB, 18 patients (15.7 %) had pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB (EPTB), the remaining 74 patients (64.4 %) had exclusively EPTB. The most common site of EPTB was lymph node (n = 61), 54 cases were left axillary lymph node involvement. 49 of 51 patients (96.1 %) were validated by pathological examination, 5 of 57 patients (8.8 %) were positive on acid fast bacilli smear, and 27 of 103 patients (26.2 %) were confirmed by mycobacterial culture. 29 of 59 patients (49.2 %) were PPD positive, 14 of 30 patients (46.7 %) were T-SPOT. TB positive. The most common complaints of patients were lymph node swelling (53.0 %), fever (36.5 %), cough (28.7 %) and dyspnea (10.4 %). There was significant difference in the time before hospital admission among different types of tuberculosis (P < 0.01), fever was also a factor influencing the time (P < 0.05). In infants, the sensitivities of routine TB tests were low and emphasize the need for improved diagnostics; EPTB was more common than pulmonary TB, tuberculous lymphadenitis constituted a high proportion of EPTB; there appears to be an association between the incidence of axillary lymph node TB and BCG vaccination among infants in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据