4.7 Article

A sequential process to synthesize Fe3O4@MnO2 hollow nanospheres for high performance supercapacitors

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 6, 期 14, 页码 1938-1947

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2qm00450j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21403091]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201908320230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a three-step sequential process was developed to synthesize Fe3O4@MnO2 hollow nanospheres, which exhibited superior electrochemical performance for supercapacitors. The as-prepared material showed high capacity, large energy density, and excellent charge-discharge durability, making it a promising alternative for energy storage and electrocatalysis applications.
Designing efficient, durable, and affordable electrodes for supercapacitors is indispensable for utilizing clean and renewable energy resources. Herein, a three-step sequential process, including two hydrothermal procedures followed by an etching treatment, was developed to synthesize Fe3O4@MnO2 hollow nanospheres (Fe3O4@MnO2-HNS) using solid silica as a hard template. Fe3O4@MnO2-HNS has the largest specific surface area (121.99 m(2) g(-1)) due to a double hollow structure compared to other samples. The as-prepared Fe3O4@MnO2-HNS exhibited superior electrochemical performance as compared to pristine hollow nanospheres of either Fe3O4 or MnO2. When applied to practical asymmetric supercapacitor devices (Fe3O4@MnO2-HNS as a positive electrode and activated carbon (AC) as a negative electrode), Fe3O4@MnO2-HNS//AC exhibited prominent performance, such as a high capacity of 168.81 C g(-1) (375.14 F g(-1)) at 0.5 A g(-1), a large energy density of 15.84 W h kg(-1) at a power density of 803 W kg(-1), and an excellent stable charge-discharge durability of 70.6% over 5000 cycles at 2 A g(-1). We envision that Fe3O4@MnO2-HNS may be a promising alternative for applications in energy storage and electrocatalysis where discrete electrochemical performances are desired.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据