4.6 Article

Rearrangement and decomposition pathways of bare and hydrogenated molybdenum oxysulfides in the gas phase

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 24, 期 27, 页码 16576-16585

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp01189a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Klima-und Energiefonds [853639]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molybdenum sulfides and molybdenum oxysulfides are potential and cost-effective alternatives to platinum catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Through collision induced dissociation experiments, stable species [Mo2O2S4]- and [HMo2O2S4]- with potential HER activity are identified.
Molybdenum sulfides and molybdenum oxysulfides are considered a promising and cheap alternative to platinum as a catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). To better understand possible rearrangements during catalyst activation, we perform collision induced dissociation experiments in the gas phase with eight different molybdenum oxysulfides, namely [Mo2O2S6](2-), [Mo2O2S6](-), [Mo2O2S5](2-), [Mo2O2S5](-), [Mo2O2S4](-), [HMo2O2S6](-), [HMo2O2S5](-) and [HMo2O2S4](-), on a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometer. We identify fragmentation channels of the molybdenum oxysulfides and their interconnections. Together with quantum chemical calculations, the results show that [Mo2O2S4](-) is a particularly stable species against further dissociation, which is reached from all starting species with relatively low collision energies. Most interestingly, H atom loss is the only fragmentation channel observed for [HMo2O2S4](-) at low collision energies, which relates to potential HER activity, since two such H atom binding sites on a surface may act together to release H-2. The calculations reveal that multiple isomers are often very close in energy, especially for the hydrogenated species, i.e., atomic hydrogen can bind at various sites of the clusters. S-2 groups play a decisive role in hydrogen adsorption. These are further features with potential relevance for HER catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据