4.2 Article

The oldest Euphasmatodea (Insecta, Phasmatodea): modern morphology in an Early Cretaceous stick insect fossil from the Crato Formation of Brazil

期刊

PAPERS IN PALAEONTOLOGY
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/spp2.1437

关键词

Phasmida; Cretaceous; Crato Formation; palaeoecology; Gondwana; stick insect

资金

  1. FundacAo de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de SAo Paulo [2020/02844-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stick insects, known for their camouflage specialization, are herbivorous insects that are mostly active at night. The lacking fossil record of stick insects, especially for older taxa, has made it difficult to understand their early evolution. Recent research has uncovered the oldest known fossil of stick insects, providing valuable insights into their evolutionary history.
Stick insects (Phasmatodea) are herbivorous, mostly nocturnal insects known for their camouflage specialization, constituting a moderately diverse group with around 3400 extant described species. The overall poor and often confusing fossil record of Phasmatodea, especially regarding older taxa, has muddled the knowledge of the early evolution of the lineage and hindered reliable calibration points for ordinal-level phylogenies. The phylogenetic relationships within the order remain unresolved, but recent research sheds more light on the subject. Here we report on the oldest known fossil of Euphasmatodea, by revising the taxonomic identity of one fossil species (Eoproscopia reliquum Mendes, Vasconcelos & Oliveira) previously described as a stick grasshopper (family Proscopiidae). Based on the finding of a more complete specimen the taxon is redescribed and a new genus, Araripephasma, is erected to accommodate this species in Euphasmatodea. Araripephasma reliquum comb. nov. is a remarkably modern-looking stick insect species that provides a new minimum age for Euphasmatodea and sets a good and reliable calibration point for phylogenetic and evolutionary studies. The implications of this rare finding for the evolutionary history of Phasmatodea are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据