4.2 Article

A Novel Application of Multiscale Entropy in Electroencephalography to Predict the Efficacy of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor in Alzheimer's Disease

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2015/953868

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yi-Lan, Taiwan [RD2009-010]
  2. National Science Council (NSC
  3. Taiwan, ROC) [100-2221-E-008-008-MY2]
  4. joint foundation of Cathay General Hospital and National Central University [CNJRF-99CGH-NCU-A3]
  5. joint foundation of Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Central University [VGHUST100-G1-4-3]
  6. NSC from the Center for Dynamical Biomarkers and Translational Medicine, National Central University, Taiwan [NSC 100-2911-I-008-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. According to one hypothesis, AD is caused by the reduced synthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Therefore, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are considered to be an effective therapy. For clinicians, however, AChE inhibitors are not a predictable treatment for individual patients. We aimed to disclose the difference by biosignal processing. In this study, we used multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis, which can disclose the embedded information in different time scales, in electroencephalography (EEG), in an attempt to predict the efficacy of AChE inhibitors. Seventeen newly diagnosed AD patients were enrolled, with an initial minimental state examination (MMSE) score of 18.8 +/- 4.5. After 12 months of AChE inhibitor therapy, 7 patients were responsive and 10 patients were nonresponsive. The major difference between these two groups is Slope 2 (MSE6 to 20). The area below the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of Slope 2 is 0.871 (95% CI = 0.69-1). The sensitivity is 85.7% and the specificity is 60%, whereas the cut-off value of Slope 2 is -0.024. Therefore, MSE analysis of EEG signals, especially Slope 2, provides a potential tool for predicting the efficacy of AChE inhibitors prior to therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据