4.1 Review

Prevalence of Depression and Cancer - A systematic review

出版社

VANDENHOECK & RUPRECHT GMBH & CO KG

关键词

Cancer; Clinical Depression; Comorbidity; Review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to provide a representative and global overview of the comorbidity between cancer and clinical depression. A systematic review of studies from 2007 to 2019 identified a prevalence rate of clinical depression in cancer patients ranging from 7.9% to 32.4%, with a mean of 21.2%. Different assessment methods led to variations in prevalence rates, but in general, the risk for a cancer patient to suffer from clinical depression during the first year after diagnosis was found to be 15% to 20%.
Objective: While comorbidity of different forms of cancer and clinical depression is reported for many single studies, representative and global overviews are scarce. Methods: A systematic review was carried out (mainly based on Medline, Embase, Cochrane, PsychLit, and Psyndex) to identify studies in adult cancer patients from 2007 to 2019. Studies with noncancer populations and cancer survivors were excluded. Assessment methods of depression were chart-based diagnoses, interview-based and self-report questionnaires. Quality and plausibility were checked using the adapted Downs & Black checklist. Results: For all 210 included studies the prevalence rate of clinical depression varied from 7.9 % to 32.4 %, with a mean of 21.2 % depression for different (mixed) cancer entities. The different methods of assessment have led to under- (especially charts-based diagnoses) as well as overreporting for some forms of cancer. In general, the different assessment forms show an acceptable variation in prevalence. Conclusions: The risk for a cancer patient to suffer a clinical depression during the first year after diagnoses is 15 % to 20 %, meaning every fifth or sixth patients. Different cancer entities, stage of cancer and treatments as well as different cultural and medical backgrounds show only slight variation in prevalence rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据