4.7 Article

Scalar field dark matter with two components: Combined approach from particle physics and cosmology

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 105, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083533

关键词

-

资金

  1. CONACyT [376127, 304001, 786444, 660893, 831066, Catedra 341]
  2. DGAPA-PAPIIT UNAM Project [TA100122]
  3. Royal Astronomical Society [FRAS 10147]
  4. DGAPA-PAPIIT-UNAM Project [IN109321]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the possibility of incorporating particle physics motivated scalar fields into the dark matter cosmological model. The analysis is performed using one to two scalar fields to examine their impact on the cosmic flow. The results show that the combination of scalar fields has a significant effect on the cosmological expansion.
In this work we explore the possibility of incorporating particle physics motivated scalar fields to the dark matter cosmological model. In this landscape, we consider the classical complex scalar field in a certain region in the parameter space of the model that increases the number of neutrino species N-eff in order to be consistent with the observed abundance of light elements produced at big bang nucleosynthesis. We perform analyses using one and two scalar fields. We examine the difference between these models and the priors considered at the edges of the cosmic ladder, this with the purpose of studying the impact of such models on the Hubble cosmic flow. In the two scalar field models we explore the possibility of combining an axion and a Higgs-like field as well as a Higgs-like field and the classical field, we show that in the first case there is no set of parameters that allows us to be consistent with N-eff, while in the second case a strong restriction to the set of parameters is obtained. This last restriction is given in terms of a maximum bound of the fraction of Higgs-like field that can be incorporated together with the classical field. Our results could be relevant in the direct dark matter detection programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据