4.6 Article

A novel electrochemical sensor for determination of uric acid in the presence of ascorbic acid and dopamine based on a carbon paste electrode modified with an electrochemically reduced para-nitrobenzoic acid/graphene oxide nanocomposite

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 27, 页码 12941-12951

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nj01358d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Council of Alzahra University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a highly sensitive electrochemical sensor was developed by modifying a carbon paste electrode with an electrochemically reduced para-nitrobenzoic acid/graphene oxide nanocomposite for the measurement of uric acid. The modified electrode showed excellent performance for uric acid determination and was suitable for analysis of real samples.
In this study, a highly sensitive electrochemical sensor based on a carbon paste electrode was modified by an electrochemically reduced para-nitrobenzoic acid/graphene oxide nanocomposite to measure uric acid. Field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were employed to characterize the modified electrode. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) methods were used to investigate the modified electrode for the electrocatalytic oxidation of uric acid in aqueous solutions. The effects of experimental parameters including pH and the scan rate were investigated using the uric acid cyclic voltammetry response. The highest peak current was obtained at pH = 7 with a diffusion-controlled mechanism. By using differential pulse voltammetry, the peak current was linearly dependent on the concentration of uric acid in the ranges of 0.1-54 mu M and 54-600 mu M with a detection limit of 48 nM (S/N = 3). It was demonstrated that the modified carbon paste electrode reported here is suitable for the determination of uric acid in real samples like human blood serum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据