3.8 Article

Buried with their Buckles On: Clothed Burial at the Augustinian Friary, Cambridge

期刊

MEDIEVAL ARCHAEOLOGY
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 151-187

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00766097.2022.2065066

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [200368/Z/15/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust [200368/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The girdle buckles found in several groups of burials at the later-medieval Augustinian friary in Cambridge suggest that clothed burial was common during this period. The burial was highly regulated, with specific garments and buckles used, and was limited to members of the Augustinian Order. These buckles symbolized corporate and personal identities. Similar typological parallels found at other English Augustinian friaries indicate broader connections and identities. The unique opportunity to contextualize the use of these buckles by a specific segment of society is presented by the Cambridge Augustinian friary.
GIRDLE BUCKLES ASSOCIATED with several groups of burials at the later-medieval Augustinian friary in Cambridge indicate that clothed burial was common, with a much higher prevalence than usual for the period. The clothed burial was highly regularised, in terms of both the garments worn and the types of buckles used, and apparently limited to members of the Augustinian Order. The buckles were primarily supplied by the friary, rather than representing individual choices, and there is evidence that the girdles that individuals were buried with were those they used in life. These buckles functioned on several levels, as symbols of both corporate and personal identity. Discoveries at other English Augustinian friaries demonstrate specific typological parallels, indicating broader connections, networks and identities. Although buckles are common late-medieval items, those from the Cambridge Augustinian friary present a unique opportunity to contextualise their use by one segment of society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据