4.5 Review

Aquaculture Production and Value Chains in the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REPORTS
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 423-435

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-022-00364-6

关键词

Aquaculture; Pandemic; Seafood; Supply chain; Consumption

资金

  1. CAUL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on input supply, production, distribution, and consumption in the aquaculture industry. Lockdowns, social distancing, supply chain disruptions, and transport restrictions have affected seafood production, marketing, and consumption. Collaboration is needed to rebuild supply chains and fish marketing for sustainable aquaculture practices.
Purpose of Review The purpose of this review is to summarize the impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on aquaculture input supply, production, distribution, and consumption. Recent Findings The COVID-19 pandemic-related lockdowns, social distancing, supply chain disruptions, and transport restrictions affect seafood production, distribution, marketing, and consumption. Recommendations are suggested to overcome these challenges. The COVID-19 has led to disruption of aquaculture practices worldwide. The pandemic has adversely affected the aquaculture input supply of fish stocking and feeding, which, in turn, has impacted aquaculture production. Moreover, the COVID-19 crisis has had adverse effects on value addition to aquaculture products, through the restrictions of seafood marketing and exporting. Aquatic food production is vulnerable to the effects of COVID-19 outbreak; hence, adaptation strategies must be developed to cope with the challenges. There is an urgent need for collaboration among key stakeholders to rebuild the supply chain of inputs and fish marketing for sustainable aquaculture practices. International agencies, donors, government and non-governmental organizations, researchers, and policymakers need to develop policies to support aquaculture production and supply chains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据