4.3 Review

Caffeine: Some of the Evidence behind Its Use and Abuse in the Preterm Infant

期刊

NEONATOLOGY
卷 119, 期 4, 页码 428-432

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000525267

关键词

Caffeine; Preterm infant; Apnea of prematurity

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health of the Prematurity-Related Ventilatory Control (Pre-Vent): Role in Respiratory Out-comes project [U01 HL133689, U01 HL133708]
  2. University of Miami Project New Born

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apnea of prematurity is a developmental disorder that affects preterm infants. The use of caffeine is a common treatment for this condition, as it has been shown to reduce apnea episodes and potentially have beneficial effects on neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, there is still uncertainty regarding its efficacy and safety, and further research is needed to provide stronger evidence.
Apnea of prematurity is a developmental disorder affecting most extremely preterm infants. The consequences of apnea of prematurity on neurodevelopment are not well established, but several reports suggest that apnea and hypoxemia episodes may be associated with worse neurological outcome. Caffeine is the only FDA-approved drug for the prevention and treatment of apnea of prematurity. Besides its clear effectiveness to reduce apnea, the use of caffeine appears to have a wide margin of safety and has been associated with possible beneficial effects on later neurodevelopmental outcome. At the same time, there are also many studies in experimental animals and some in preterm infants suggesting potential serious adverse effects from caffeine administration, especially when using higher doses. Because of these uncertainties, there is a wide variation in caffeine use across institutions. This review summarizes some of the available evidence on caffeine use in this population, its indications and best timing of initiation and discontinuation, appropriate dosing, and some of the possible adverse effects of caffeine administration. Because of the many gaps in knowledge, especially as it relates to efficacy and safety, we encourage further basic and clinical studies to provide stronger evidence, not only on its potential beneficial effects but also its side effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据