4.5 Review

An Overview: Organophosphate Flame Retardants in the Atmosphere

期刊

AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

TAIWAN ASSOC AEROSOL RES-TAAR
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.220148

关键词

Atmospheric particle-bound contaminants; Emerging contaminants; Organophosphate esters; PM2.5; Long-range transport

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on the current knowledge of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) in the atmosphere. It is found that OPFRs mainly exist in the particulate phase, with chlorinated-OPFRs being the main compounds. OPFRs have been detected in remote environments, suggesting long-range transport potential. Some atmospheric transformations of OPFRs have been reported to be more toxic and persistent than parent compounds.
Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) have been adopted as safer alternatives to polybrominated biphenyl ether flame retardants. However, because of their ubiquitous presence in the environment and the growing evidence of health risks, there has been growing research interest in understanding the fate and effects of these compounds in the environment. This review focuses on the current knowledge of OPFRs in the atmosphere. There is no consensus on the target OPFR for analysis, making comparisons challenging. However, we can still conclude that OPFRs partition mainly in the particulate phase, and chlorinated-OPFRs are the main compounds in the atmosphere. The general concentration trends from the literature were: PM2.5 > TSP > air. However, the gas-phase OPFRs in the published studies might be significantly underestimated because of sampling artifacts. OPFRs were also found in remote environments in Antarctica, the Arctic, and high mountains, suggesting long-range transport potential. For example, concentrations up to 92.3 +/- 13.8 pg m(-3) in the air have been measured in the Antarctic. Lastly, atmospheric transformations of some OPFRs have been reported as more toxic and persistent than parent compounds, indicating additional risk. However, they are currently not measured or included during risk assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据