4.8 Article

Mg3(Bi,Sb)2-based thermoelectric modules for efficient and reliable waste-heat utilization up to 750 K

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 3265-3274

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ee01038k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51871053, 52174343]
  2. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [202101070003E00110]
  3. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [20JC1415200]
  4. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation [CHN 1210297 HFST-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective thermoelectric modules have been developed, operating stably at high temperatures and achieving a high conversion efficiency, demonstrating feasibility and scalability for waste heat recovery applications.
Thermoelectric modules can directly convert the waste heat released by plants or vehicles into useful electricity, providing a clean and sustainable way to use fossil energy more efficiently. However, their commercial application in power generation, especially at temperatures above 500 K, has proceeded very slowly due to the low module efficiency, scarce or toxic constituent elements, and lack of stable metallization at high temperatures. Here, we develop a highly efficient, environmentally friendly and cost-effective thermoelectric module by using n-type Se-doped Mg-3(Bi,Sb)(2) and p-type CoSb3-based skutterudite. The module can operate robustly up to 750 K and achieves a conversion efficiency of over 9% under a temperature difference of 450 K, superior to that of state-of-the-art single-stage thermoelectric modules. These achievements result from a comprehensive study involving optimization of the material composition and microstructure, screening for effective diffusion barrier layers, and rational design of the module structure. Our work demonstrates the feasibility and scalability of efficient and reliable thermoelectric modules based on sustainable elements for broad applications in mid-temperature waste heat recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据