4.6 Article

Combining Cu-SSZ-13 with TiO2: promotion of urea decomposition and influence on SCR

期刊

REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 2121-2131

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2re00140c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0211202]
  2. National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control Technology [NELMS2020A08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully improved the urea decomposition activity and reduced the deposition of solid by-products by combining Cu-SSZ-13 catalyst with TiO2 nanoparticles. The composited catalysts showed higher NOx conversion and lower urea-related deposits compared to unmodified Cu-SSZ-13 in a simulated urea deposition scenario. The superiority of the composited catalysts was maintained even under hydrothermal aging conditions at 800 degrees C.
Urea is applied as an ammonia source for SCR in diesel vehicles, but incomplete urea decomposition may lead to insufficiency of NH3 and deposition of solid by-products. To improve the urea decomposition activity of Cu-SSZ-13 SCR catalysts, Cu-SSZ-13 was combined with TiO2 nanoparticles by a simple impregnation method. TiO2/Cu-SSZ-13 composites exhibited lowered decomposition temperatures of urea and related solid by-products. Thus, the composited catalysts showed higher NOx conversion and a lower amount of urea-related deposits than unmodified Cu-SSZ-13 in a simulated urea deposition scenario. The superiority of the urea decomposition activity of the composited catalysts was maintained upon 800 degrees C hydrothermal aging due to stabilized anatase over the catalysts according to XRD and Raman spectroscopy. H-2-TPR, UV-vis, and STEM revealed the formation of Cu-Ti-O species due to Cu-Ti interactions, which was adverse to SCR activity, but no extra hydrothermal aging effect was observed on the composited catalysts compared with unmodified Cu-SSZ-13. This work showed the potential to improve the low-temperature urea-SCR performance of Cu-SSZ-13 via TiO2 modification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据