3.8 Proceedings Paper

Distributed continuous-time algorithm for resource allocation over unbalanced directed networks

期刊

IFAC PAPERSONLINE
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 55-60

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.05.010

关键词

fixed-time; unbalanced anddirected network; initialization-free; resource allocation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62173118]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20210492]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2021QN1052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study addresses the distributed resource allocation problem over unbalanced directed networks with local inequality constraint and global equality constraint. A distributed gradient algorithm is developed based on the fixed-time projection method, and the corresponding eigenvalue is obtained within fixed-time by tapping the row-stochastic or column-stochastic Laplacian matrix to overcome the unbalance of directed weights. Therefore, the optimal solution can be obtained asymptotically. The proposed algorithm is initialization-free and has constant control parameters. The effectiveness is demonstrated through several case studies.
The problem we aim to solve in this study is the distributed resource allocation problem (DRAP) over unbalanced directed networks, in which the local inequality constraint and global equality constraint are considered. On the basis of the fixed-time projection method, a distributed gradient algorithm is developed. The corresponding eigenvalue is obtained within fixed-time by tapping the row-stochastic or column-stochastic Laplacian matrix to overcome the unbalance of directed weights. Therefore, the optimal solution can be obtained asymptotically. Moreover, the proposed algorithm is initialization-free and its control parameters are constant. Finally, the effectiveness is illustrated by several case studies. Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据