4.7 Article

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and first-principles calculations of Cr3+ doped KDP crystals

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 24, 期 27, 页码 4948-4954

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ce00335j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Young Scholars Program of Shandong University [2018WLJH65]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51902299]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the characteristics of potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) crystals doped with Cr(NO3)3 at a level of approximately 10 ppm using UV-vis absorption spectrum, EPR spectroscopy, and first-principles calculations. The results show that Cr atoms substitute K atoms in KDP crystals, and charge compensation is achieved through two adjacent H vacancies.
The characteristics of potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) crystals with Cr(NO3)(3) doping at the similar to 10 ppm level were studied using the ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectrum, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR), and first-principles calculations. According to the UV-vis absorption spectrum, there are three additional absorption peaks in the 200-800 nm regions on KDP:Cr(NO3)(3) crystals compared with undoped KDP crystals. The angular-dependence EPR spectra of a Cr3+ paramagnetic centre of the KDP:Cr(NO3)(3) crystal were obtained at room temperature. The spin Hamiltonian parameters (g and D tensors) of the Cr3+ centre were extracted using a least-squares fitting code. The first-principles calculations show that the formation energy is the lowest when the Cr atom substitutes the K atom. In addition, the d-d orbital electron transition Cr3+ ion may contribute to the two absorption peaks (451 nm and 650 nm) in the UV-vis absorption spectrum. Based on the experiments and theoretical calculations, it was inferred that in the KDP:Cr(NO3)(3) crystal, Cr atoms occupy an average position of K atoms, and the charge compensation is reached through two adjacent H vacancies to meet the electrical neutrality requirement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据