3.8 Article

Colorectal Cancer Treatment Characteristics and Concordance With Guidelines in Sri Lanka: Results From a Hospital-Based Cancer Registry

期刊

JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/GO.22.00004

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the disease characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with colorectal cancer in Sri Lanka, highlighting the challenges posed by an aging population and late-stage diagnosis.
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the top five incident cancers in Sri Lanka (SL). Here, we describe disease characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with CRC in SL. METHODS All adult patients (age > 18 years) diagnosed with CRC during 2016-2020 were identified from the National Cancer Institute SL cancer registry. Cancer stage at diagnosis was defined according to the seventh edition of the TNM staging system. Concordance between recommendations for adjuvant therapy and actual rates of delivery was also analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study cohort and treatment patterns. RESULTS A total of 1,578 patients were diagnosed with CRC during the study period, 53% (n = 830) with colon cancer and 47% (n = 748) with rectal cancer. Mean age was 61 (range, 18-91) years. Stage distribution was 13%, 28%, 46%, and 12% for stage I, II, III, and IV cancers, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 82% of patients with stage III colon cancer. There was a lack of concordance with delivery of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, which was only delivered to 50% of patients with stage III rectal cancer for whom this treatment was indicated. CONCLUSION Aging population and advanced stage of CRC at diagnosis will continue to challenge the provision of high-quality CRC care in SL. Further quantitative and qualitative research may help better understand the nonconcordance with treatment guidelines. Such information would help ease the burden of advanced-stage CRC in SL. (C) 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据