4.6 Article

Scalable production of self-supported WS2/CNFs by electrospinning as the anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries

期刊

SCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 227-235

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-015-0992-8

关键词

WS2/CNFs; Electrospinning; Li-ion batteries; Anode; Self-supported; Crystallinity

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB932600]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21571073, 51302099]
  3. Program for HUST Interdisciplinary Innovation Team
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0227]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

WS2/carbon nanofibers (WS2/CNFs) are obtained by a simple electrospinning method in which few-/single-layer WS2 is uniformly embedded in carbon fibers. When used as the active anode material for Li-ion cells, these nanofibers exhibit a first-cycle discharge/charge capacity of 941/756 mAh/g at 100 mA/g and maintain a capacity of 458 mAh/g after 100 cycles at 1 A/g. The evolution of size and crystallinity of WS2 with heating treatment are systematically studied, which are found to strongly influence the final electrochemical performance. Interestingly, the WS2 samples of lowest crystallinity show the highest performance among all studied samples, which could result from the large interfacial capacity for Li ions due to their large specific surface area. More interestingly, the inherent flexible attribute of electrospun nanofibers renders them a great potential in the utilization of binder-free anodes. Similar high discharge/charge capacity of 761/604 mAh/g with a first coulombic efficiency of 79.4% has been achieved in these binder-free anodes. Considering the universal of such simple and scalable preparation strategy, it is very likely to extend this method to other similar two-dimensional layered materials besides WS2 and provides a promising candidate electrode for developing flexible battery devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据