4.6 Article

Evaluation of mucosal status in the follow-up of pediatric patients with celiac disease: the role of serology

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 181, 期 9, 页码 3283-3289

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04535-3

关键词

Celiac disease; Endomysium IgA; Pediatric; Serology; Tissue transglutaminase IgA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study validates the efficacy of negative tTG-IgA and/or EMA in reflecting mucosal status in the follow-up of pediatric patients with celiac disease. However, positive serology may be misleading in reflecting mucosal status.
Recent guidelines suggest non-biopsy serology-based approach for the diagnosis of celiac disease; however, there is no evidence-based data regarding noninvasive follow-up of mucosal healing. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of serology in reflecting mucosal status in the follow-up of pediatric patients with celiac disease. This is a validation study conducted at a university hospital. Patients who had biopsy proven celiac disease (Marsh III) at diagnosis, and had been followed-up for at least 12 months, were prospectively evaluated with duodenal biopsies. tTG-IgA and EMA tests were performed on the day of endoscopy. One hundred four patients with a mean age of 7.4 +/- 4.02 years were included in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of tTG-IgA were 85.2% and 61% respectively, with a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.2% but a very low positive predictive value (PPV) of 43.4%. We found that a cutoff value of 68.5 U/mL for tTG-IgA had a sensitivity, specificity of 85.2% and 85.7% respectively. The AUC was 0.891. The sensitivity and specificity of EMA was 77.8% and 87% respectively, with a high NPV of 91.8% but low PPV of 67.7%. Conclusion: This study suggests that negative tTG-IgA and/or EMA can be used as an indicator of mucosal improvement in the follow-up of pediatric patients with celiac disease. However, positive serology (i.e., <10 x ULN) may be misleading in reflecting mucosal status in the follow-up of pediatric patients with celiac disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据