4.6 Article

The transition between acute and chronic infections in light of energy control: a mathematical model of energy flow in response to infection

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0206

关键词

energy; inter-organ interactions; infections; immune response; lipolysis resistance; ageing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study constructs a mathematical model for energy flow between different subsystems of an organism and explores the role of the brain and fat in immune response. The results reveal a connection between obesity and aging with chronic infections.
Background: Different parts of an organism like the gut, endocrine, nervous and immune systems constantly exchange information. Understanding the pathogenesis of various systemic chronic diseases increasingly relies on understanding how these subsystems orchestrate their activities. Methods: We started from the working hypothesis that energy is a fundamental quantity that governs activity levels of all subsystems and that interactions between subsystems control the distribution of energy according to acute needs. Based on physiological knowledge, we constructed a mathematical model for the energy flow between subsystems and analysed the resulting organismal responses to in silico infections. Results: The model reproduces common behaviour in acute infections and suggests several host parameters that modulate infection duration and therapeutic responsiveness. Moreover, the model allows the formulation of conditions for the induction of chronic infections and predicts that alterations in energy released from fat can lead to the transition from clearance of acute infections to a chronic inflammatory state. Impact: These results suggest a fundamental role for brain and fat in controlling immune response through systemic energy control. In particular, it suggests that lipolysis resistance, which is known to be involved in obesity and ageing, might be a survival programme for coping with chronic infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据