4.5 Article

Analysis of lorlatinib analogs reveals a roadmap for targeting diverse compound resistance mutations in ALK-positive lung cancer

期刊

NATURE CANCER
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 710-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s43018-022-00399-6

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships
  2. National Cancer Institute Career Development Award [K12CA087723-16]
  3. NIH/NCI [R01CA164273]
  4. Lung Cancer Research Foundation
  5. Be a Piece of the Solution
  6. Targeting a Cure for Lung Cancer Research Fund at MGH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identifies the spectrum of lorlatinib-resistant compound ALK mutations and identifies lorlatinib analogs that can overcome these compound mutations, providing different therapeutic strategies for precision targeting.
Lorlatinib is currently the most advanced, potent and selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in the clinic; however, diverse compound ALK mutations driving therapy resistance emerge. Here, we determine the spectrum of lorlatinib-resistant compound ALK mutations in patients, following treatment with lorlatinib, the majority of which involve ALK G1202R or I1171N/S/T. We further identify structurally diverse lorlatinib analogs that harbor differential selective profiles against G1202R versus I1171N/S/T compound ALK mutations. Structural analysis revealed increased potency against compound mutations through improved inhibition of either G1202R or I1171N/S/T mutant kinases. Overall, we propose a classification of heterogenous ALK compound mutations enabling the development of distinct therapeutic strategies for precision targeting following sequential tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Hata and colleagues identify lorlatinib analogs that overcome acquired therapy resistance to current ALK inhibitors and show their efficacy in preclinical models of non-small cell lung cancer bearing compound therapy-resistant ALK alterations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据